Tag Archive for 'Open-Letters'Page 2 of 2

Cease and Desist Letter Sent to Leo Stoller

Leo Stoller
Rentamark.com
P O Box 35189
Chicago, IL 60707-0189

Re: Freedom of Expression

July 22, 2005

Dear Mr. Stoller,

Please be advised that we are stakeholders in the Freedom of Expression� Security Consortium (FESC), which, as our motto states, �regulates freedom in the marketplace of ideas.� We are writing in response to your infringing use of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, a federally registered trademark that is controlled by FESC member Kembrew McLeod, who owns the domain http://freedomofexpression.us. This mark, granted by the USPTO on January 6, 1998, is also used as the title of Dr. McLeod�s book, published in 2005 by Doubleday/Random House.

In the July 4, 2005 New York Times article about your business, �He Says He Owns the Word �Stealth,�� you said, �If a trademark owner doesn�t go up to the plate each day and police his mark, he will be overrun by third-party infringers.� Also, as you state on Rentamark.com, �There is no free well-known intellectual property left in the 21st Century. No free rides!� As a group that monitors unauthorized uses of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, we couldn�t agree more.

In the course of policing FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, we at FESC (consisting of the websites freedomofexpression.us, freedomofexpression.org, freedom-of-expression.org, and freedom-of-expression.com) have learned of your infringement, which can be found at this URL: http://www.rentamark.com/e-marks/E-I/e-i.html.

We are troubled by (1) your unrestrained use of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and (2) the fact that you have offered to license this phrase to third parties without permission. After all, not just anybody can utilize FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, and it is clear that your use of this phrase constitutes unfair competition and a blurring and tarnishing of this federally registered mark.

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION will be substantially and irreparably damaged should this infringement continue. We, therefore, demand that Rentamark.com immediately cease and desist using FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION within five days. We eagerly await your response.

Very truly yours,

Kembrew McLeod
http://freedomofexpression.us/
Freedom of Expression� Security Consortium
1037 E. Washington St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
kembrew@freedomofexpression.us

cc:
John Joseph Bachir http://freedomofexpression.org/
Fletcher Moore http://freedom-of-expression.com/
Julie Gilberg http://freedom-of-expression.org/

To AT&T Wireless

I don’t know who is advising you, but your security model SUCKS. It is RIDICULOUS to use a “secret question” to keep my account secure. Yes it’s true that a lot of answers will be very unique. But [a] it’s difficult for a user to remember exactly what they put, since they are all subjective questions [b] do a little audit of your database, I bet a solid 1% or more of the selected questions were “who would you most like to meet” with the answer being “jesus”.

Furthermore, I honestly do not have an answer to any of the questions!! I didn’t have any pets as a child, I didn’t have a hero, and I don’t have superlative feelings for ANY member of ANY of those categories. I am going to have to basically make something up, and then WRITE MY ANSWER DOWN SOMEWHERE.

What ever happened to date of birth, mother’s maiden name, and email verification with forced password change? I know there is still a small cleartext hole in that system. Maybe you have statistics that show that your system is more secure than what I propose. If so I apologize for my hurtful, ignorant criticism.

Thank you for your time,
John Joseph Bachir

secret question options




Close
Powered by ShareThis
All of mp3