<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JJB Blog &#187; directnic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/tag/directnic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>directNic is sleezy</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/07/01/directnic-is-sleezy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/07/01/directnic-is-sleezy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directnic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleezy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/07/01/directnic-is-sleezy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my post a couple days ago about why I hate Network Solutions, I held up directNic.com as a not-sleezy alternative to Network Solutions. A friend of mine, who wishes to remain anonymous, commented and pointed out that DirectNic is also sleezy. Here is said friend&#8217;s experience with directNic: The directNic guy is a major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In my post a couple days ago about <a href="http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/06/30/i-hate-network-solutions/">why I hate Network Solutions</a>, I held up directNic.com as a not-sleezy alternative to Network Solutions. A friend of mine, who wishes to remain anonymous, commented and pointed out that DirectNic is also sleezy. Here is said friend&#8217;s experience with directNic:</em></p>
<hr/>
<p>The directNic guy is a major domain-stealer / squatter who abuses his position as registrar to that end.  Sorta like a domain-squatter with superpowers.</p>
<p>I ran into trouble with them when my [first initial, last name]@rice.edu email address expired.  I had some domains with DirectNic which were soon to expire, but I had lost my DirectNic password.  I figured it would be no big deal to contact them and have my account changed to [first initial, last name]@alumni.rice.edu; the same person, obviously enough.  This is what I got in response:</p>
<blockquote><p>Greetings,</p>
<p>First of all, you are not the owner of the directNIC account whose username is &#8216;[character name used in paper-based role playing game in 8th grade]&#8216;, and login information will ONLY be sent to the owner of a directNIC account. Thus, you must have the owner of the directNIC account to contact us. Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance.</p>
<p>Thank You</p>
<p>Khanh Ngo<br />
DirectNIC</p></blockquote>
<p>At the time, I didn&#8217;t understand why they were stonewalling me.  I didn&#8217;t care to deal with the attitude so I figured I&#8217;d just let my domains lapse.  I backordered with another service, and I waited.</p>
<p>As it turns out, that&#8217;s exactly how DirectNic&#8217;s scam works.  When a customer&#8217;s domain lapses, they don&#8217;t release it like you&#8217;d expect.  Instead, they transfer it to a shell company and hold it for ransom.  I didn&#8217;t want to suffer the indignity of buying my own domains back, so I switched all my sites to new domains instead.</p>
<p>I searched google and found that the same thing had happened to other people, such as <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/163/ripoff0163793.htm">this guy</a>.</p>
<p>Holding expired domains for ransom isn&#8217;t the only way DirectNic abuses its power as registrar.  It appears that they also <a href="http://www.webhostingtalk.com/archive/index.php/t-507904.html">register domains based on search results</a>.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my experience with DirectNic.  It&#8217;s been years now, and a directNic shell company is STILL squatting on one of the domains I registered through them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/07/01/directnic-is-sleezy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

