John Joseph Bachir

4 Reasons Why NOW is the Time to Donate (More!) to the Obama Campaign

In this article, I discuss 1) Why we should give money to the Obama campaign, and 2) How much to give.

If you are already convinced that we need to give money to the campaign, and/or you have already donated, you can skip down to the “How much to give?” section at the end of the article.

Why does the Obama Campaign need more money?

These past few weeks, the polls and the narrative in the media have made it seem like an Obama victory is inevitable. He certainly performed strongly in all of the debates, and the campaign has been able to largely avoid or divert any smears and attacks.

But we’ve still got 2 weeks to go, and it would be dangerous to become overconfident at a time like this. Here’s why:

  1. Obama’s lead has been shrinking the past few days.

    October 12 - McCain: 40, Obama 53 (13 point lead)
    October 18 - McCain: 43, Obama 50 (7 point lead)

    source

    This shrinking lead is something to take very seriously. It is impossible to know if the lead will continue to shrink or bounce back in the next two weeks (see point 2, below).

  2. Gore in 2000

    Quoting from a recent email from the Obama campaign:

    In October of 2000, Al Gore had a double-digit lead in the polls. By Election Day, it came down to one state and a handful of votes.

  3. Last-minute smear attacks

    When the 2004 election season was getting started, Bush was plenty unpopular. Kerry, with his long political career and extensive military achievements, had a rock-solid patriotic image, and was in a good position to start winning over undecided and moderate voters.

    Until the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth began their unprecedented months-long smear campaign, destroying Kerry’s image.

    Something just as egregious, but less visible, is happening right now as you’re reading this — the “robo call” smear campaign. McCain-Palin and the RNC are spending $70,000,000 (seventy million dollars) calling voters in 10 swing states with these messages:

    Hello. I’m calling for John McCain and the RNC because you need to know that Barack Obama has worked closely with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, whose organization bombed the US Capitol, the Pentagon, a judge’s home and killed Americans.

    You need to know that Barack Obama and his Democrat allies in the Illinois Senate opposed a bill requiring doctors to care for babies born alive after surviving attempted abortions — a position at odds even with John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama and his liberal Democrats are too extreme for America. Please vote — vote for the candidates who share our values.

    source

  4. Disenfranchisement of voters.

    Over the last decade, Republicans have unapologetically disenfranchised voters in every election, and this one is no exception.

How much to give?

Many of you reading this have probably made at least a small donation to the Obama campaign. Unless you have a very limited income, you have probably thought to yourself at some point, “Should I donate a little more?”.

Think of it this way: what are the most important things to spend money on in your life right now? If you’re life will be just fine if McCain wins, then you don’t need to think about giving more money. If the changes that Obama will bring to this country won’t drastically improve your financial security, your physical security, your physical health, or your mental health, then you don’t need to donate.

I’m pretty sure that if you are reading this, then that’s not the case. I urge you to donate as much as you possibly can. Don’t think that enough other people will donate, so you don’t have to. That’s the same thing as thinking that enough other people will vote, so you don’t have to.

And don’t think that the Obama campaign already has enough money. Every dollar you give directly translates into more campaigning in swing states, to counteract and surpass McCain-Palin’s efforts in those same states. (In the unlikely scenario that there is a significant surplus of funds, the money will go to the DNC, which is doing great work these days.)

It would be nice if the politician with the best ideas won, but we know that’s not how it works. If you have any kernel of faith that Obama will win because America and the news media like him better these days, you need to get over that. Election after election, the candidate who raises the most money wins, period.

In 2008, given the state of our country and the world, and the candidates on the ballot, I believe that it is irresponsible to not donate as much money to the Obama campaign as you possibly can, whatever that might mean for you.

If you’re a student, or otherwise have a very limited income, this might mean an extra $20.

If you’re working, but have your share of financial responsibilities (loans, children), consider cutting down on drinks, eating out, or even your monthly savings, and give an extra $100-$500.

If you’re working and have very few financial responsibilities, consider giving a lot. Consider giving the maximum allowed by campaign fundraising laws in the post-primary season – $2300. That’s what I did.

Even if you have to cut into your savings to donate, think of it this way– getting Obama into office is a more important investment in your future than a few hundred extra dollars sitting in your bank account.

Click here to donate now.


11 Comments

There are many people who were leaning towards Obama and those are the target of the robo calls currently being placed in all of the contested states. Therefore more money is needed to reject and deflect those charges … Obama needs those “leaners” in his column.
We have all seen the results of an “unclear” winner in our presidential elections … let’s give so that Barack Obama has a “clear” win this year!
Republican for Obama

Posted by Lee Russ on 19 October 2008 @ 7am

man, John. I thought i was a model citizen until i read this post. i will definitely make another donation having read it, and i thought i’d already been squeezed to the limit.

Posted by memorly on 23 October 2008 @ 3pm

m- I’m glad it resonated with you. I think the fact that the candidate with the most money wins is the biggest mental hurdle for most people– because we all want the system to be somewhat different.

That said, if everyone in the US who made less than 250k gave the obama campaign $20, he would have the most money, so that’s still pretty democratic. :)

Maybe in the next election I will quit all my projects and spend 10 months going door to door with a high-pressure spiel convincing each household to shell out… $20.

Posted by John on 23 October 2008 @ 5pm

Oh and– share my blog post with your friends!

Posted by John on 23 October 2008 @ 5pm

I think this time, more and more people are paying attention, and America liking Obama, will be one of the reason he’ll win; Even “Saturday night live” is making a difference, as people paying attention to it… Not to say that every dollar does not count, every dollar does count; but this election will be an exception; the person with good ideas will have an edge!

Posted by myrna on 24 October 2008 @ 9pm

Well, I’m interested in what you think now. Was your money well invested? No, I’m not just being crass. I’m very interested. I’m on the other end of the age spectrum. My life experience tells me Obama is dangerous. The last many months confirm this – to me. But I am so curious why young people like him. I know they are, as I am, disgusted with the state of things but why do they (you) want undefined change? Do the dirty deals made in the last few weeks to buy Democrat Senators change your mind? Do you really think that we can pay for all this “change” and have a country left for your children (my grandchildren)? I was touched by your post on Romans 12. I know that God wants me to be generous and hold His gifts to me with an open hand but do you really think that God wants you (and your majority) to take my earnings without my permission, do you want to pay for abortion? I am very interested in learning so that I can understand. It seems all so very alien to me. Socialism has been a disaster in any place it has been tried, sometimes a nation destroying disaster and sometimes just bogging a nation in mediocrity. If you have time help me understand.

Posted by Al on 24 December 2009 @ 9am

Hi Al.

Yes, I’m still glad. Unfortunately we are in a 2 party system, so we have to vote for the lesser of 2 weak candidates, and I am very glad that Obama won instead of McCain.

Socialism has actually succeeded wildly in essentially all of the places it has been implemented — certainly in the last 50 years.

Do you have an example of a country where socialism has been a disaster?

Posted by John on 7 January 2010 @ 12am

Well, yes – Cuba, Russia, Eastern Europe (and increasingly Europe in general, actually I cannot think of anywhere where it has worked except in the very early Christian church where it worked because it was voluntary. Some argue China is a good example but that would be a long debate since they are not true socialists and you still have the issue of an oppressive and unresponsive domineering government.

And I guess it also depends on your definition of disaster. Socialism is another form of utopianism which is based on hope and faith that man is good and perfectible through education. It has always lead to an autocratic and oppressive government because there are no men (or women) who are good and will actually serve rather than amass power. It is the same problem we are having except that our form of government is better suited, it was designed to recognize the inherent nature of man and institute checks and balances to retard the effects of bad men. We certainly have grave problems but I think it is because of the nature of man not the system essentially (improvements can always be made). What Obama and this regime aim for, it appears, is a restructuring that is like most other socialist revolutions – let us who know best take care of you who know nothing. Thus freedom is exchanged for security or so goes the promise. The reality is that freedom and security vanish.

May I ask what places you see as successful socialist states? Also, I see from your Nov 2004 post that you have a strong belief in the bible. May I ask if you consider yourself an orthodox Christian, believing in the authority of the bible, the virgin birth, the substitutionary atonement of Christ etc.?

Posted by Al on 7 January 2010 @ 9am

First of all, I don’t want the US to become “a socialist state”, and I do not believe Obama is trying to do this at all.

Socialism is a philosophy about how to distribute certain parts of wealth generated by a group of people — it’s not a political system or even necessarily an economic system. The USSR was an abject dictatorship for much of its existence, as Cuba continues to be in some respects.

Many countries in Europe today have democratically elected leaders who decide to provide certain government services, such as health care, using the country’s money. The end results is often better and cheaper health care than as is the case in the US.

Why do you think i have a “strong believe in the bible” just because I quoted an excerpt from it?

Posted by John on 10 January 2010 @ 6pm

Yes, the question about the bible was just related to your quote and comments. Wrong assumption? Sorry.

Yes, I understand your point about socialism (or communism) as a philosophy vs. what has been put into application in various places.

So, now I know you do not want a socialist state. Back to my question about your passion for Obama and the course of this administration. Seeing this among many younger early career people I am just curious to understand the key attraction. I certainly understand the social justice issue, that is important to me to, what I don’t understand is the feeling that a stronger government, or a central planning elite, is more capable of achieving this. And are there other issues besides social justice?

Posted by Al on 11 January 2010 @ 9am

Republicans over the last several decades, and in particular during the Bush administration, have been responsible for the wildly increased centralized power of the executive branch. And I think both parties have been equally as guilty about bringing economic and legal power into federal instead of state jurisdiction.

Obama has had a very light legislative touch since he came into office — he could have a much heavier hand with things like health care reform, but has chose to largely stay at the sidelines. This behavior is the very opposite of that exhibited by the Bush administration.

Posted by John on 26 January 2010 @ 5pm

Leave a Comment