http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2008/02/10/comparing-the-taxonomy-of-the-obama-and-clinton-website-issues-menus/ Sun, 20 May 2012 16:50:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2008/02/10/comparing-the-taxonomy-of-the-obama-and-clinton-website-issues-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-1478 phil Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:55:11 +0000 http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2008/02/10/comparing-the-taxonomy-of-the-obama-and-clinton-website-issues-menus/#comment-1478 Interesting analysis - although clearly biased in favor of Obama. From a taxonomy perspective, Clinton't mistake was to call the group "Issues". They aren't. In fact, they are goals. I would also say that although Obama's content is the "real deal", Clinton's is more suited to the attention span of the average American. Most won't click through to read the content behind the menu item. With Clinton, you get more information value by reading the menu compared to Obama's menu - and simply reading the menu is the more realistic and probable outcome of the web visitor's experience. (Never underestimate human lazyness.) Interesting analysis – although clearly biased in favor of Obama. From a taxonomy perspective, Clinton’t mistake was to call the group “Issues”. They aren’t. In fact, they are goals. I would also say that although Obama’s content is the “real deal”, Clinton’s is more suited to the attention span of the average American. Most won’t click through to read the content behind the menu item. With Clinton, you get more information value by reading the menu compared to Obama’s menu – and simply reading the menu is the more realistic and probable outcome of the web visitor’s experience. (Never underestimate human lazyness.)

]]> http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2008/02/10/comparing-the-taxonomy-of-the-obama-and-clinton-website-issues-menus/comment-page-1/#comment-1477 ozamerican Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:58:08 +0000 http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2008/02/10/comparing-the-taxonomy-of-the-obama-and-clinton-website-issues-menus/#comment-1477 Good analysis of a topic no one else has covered. Thank you! Good analysis of a topic no one else has covered. Thank you!

]]>