<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s involvement in the HTML 5 working group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m proud of you, jjb.  Today my coworkers were seriously discussing blocking IE6 from accessing an application we inherited while we rewrite it, because it works on IE 5 and 7 (and every browser that even pretends to care about web standards), but getting it to work in IE6 would not be trivial. It blows my mind that a browser could be so out of touch that a person could make a very strong argument for locking all its users out of a public application.  We dream of a better world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m proud of you, jjb.  Today my coworkers were seriously discussing blocking IE6 from accessing an application we inherited while we rewrite it, because it works on IE 5 and 7 (and every browser that even pretends to care about web standards), but getting it to work in IE6 would not be trivial. It blows my mind that a browser could be so out of touch that a person could make a very strong argument for locking all its users out of a public application.  We dream of a better world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne van Kesteren</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne van Kesteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2007/04/25/microsofts-involvement-in-the-html-5-working-group/#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>FWIW: the chairs of the Working Group where decided before the Working Group was formed. Daniel Glazman in particular raised concerns about that before the Working Group was formed, but most people, including representatives from Apple, Mozilla and Opera were ok with Chris Wilson being co-chair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW: the chairs of the Working Group where decided before the Working Group was formed. Daniel Glazman in particular raised concerns about that before the Working Group was formed, but most people, including representatives from Apple, Mozilla and Opera were ok with Chris Wilson being co-chair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

