<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New article: Delivering a 16:9 project using 4:3 footage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/</link>
	<description>John Joseph Bachir's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-223673</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-223673</guid>
		<description>You can have it play back letterboxed on a 4:3 screen and fullscreen on a 16:9 screen if you deliver with a anamorphic DVD.

Or I suppose, if you deliver with a 16:9 video file, and whatever you are using to play back on the 4:3 screen (like, say, quicktime player) does its own fullscreening.

You won't lose quality with any of the above if you do it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have it play back letterboxed on a 4:3 screen and fullscreen on a 16:9 screen if you deliver with a anamorphic DVD.</p>
<p>Or I suppose, if you deliver with a 16:9 video file, and whatever you are using to play back on the 4:3 screen (like, say, quicktime player) does its own fullscreening.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t lose quality with any of the above if you do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-223672</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-223672</guid>
		<description>Say I shot my footage in 4:3 and wanted it to play back letterboxed on a 4:3 screen and fullscreen (cropped) on a 16x9 screen.  Would I be better off working in 4x3 (distorted) and setting the compression to 16x9, or is there a way I can work in Final Cut Pro 16x9 and get a 4:3 monitor to letterbox?

Basically, I want to crop my 4:3 footage to 16x9 and I can't tell if streching it so that the canvas is filled and the top and bottom are cut off is degrading the quality.

Sorry if that was confusing, I'm very confused myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say I shot my footage in 4:3 and wanted it to play back letterboxed on a 4:3 screen and fullscreen (cropped) on a 16&#215;9 screen.  Would I be better off working in 4&#215;3 (distorted) and setting the compression to 16&#215;9, or is there a way I can work in Final Cut Pro 16&#215;9 and get a 4:3 monitor to letterbox?</p>
<p>Basically, I want to crop my 4:3 footage to 16&#215;9 and I can&#8217;t tell if streching it so that the canvas is filled and the top and bottom are cut off is degrading the quality.</p>
<p>Sorry if that was confusing, I&#8217;m very confused myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-222471</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-222471</guid>
		<description>Thanks the the help-- your article is awesome! Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks the the help&#8211; your article is awesome! Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-222470</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-222470</guid>
		<description>Well, I just haven't worked with this stuff for a long time, so I couldn't offer much help myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I just haven&#8217;t worked with this stuff for a long time, so I couldn&#8217;t offer much help myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-222469</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-222469</guid>
		<description>John, 

Thanks. Ken Stone is the best. Indeed; cryptic posts by nature yield little! Apologies if my post was difficult to understand... :) Thanks again.

Robin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, </p>
<p>Thanks. Ken Stone is the best. Indeed; cryptic posts by nature yield little! Apologies if my post was difficult to understand&#8230; :) Thanks again.</p>
<p>Robin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-222468</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-222468</guid>
		<description>Robin-

I haven't worked with this stuff for a while. Check out the Ken Stone discussions:

http://www.kenstone.net/cgi/discussions/general.cgi

Present your question there. The people there are very helpful, but make sure to ask a good question. Take some time putting your question together so that it's easy for someone to understand your problem.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin-</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t worked with this stuff for a while. Check out the Ken Stone discussions:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kenstone.net/cgi/discussions/general.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://www.kenstone.net/cgi/discussions/general.cgi</a></p>
<p>Present your question there. The people there are very helpful, but make sure to ask a good question. Take some time putting your question together so that it&#8217;s easy for someone to understand your problem.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-222465</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-222465</guid>
		<description>Great site. 

Working with  anamorphic footage and regular 3:2 footage in dv ntsc 3:2 sequence. Burnng this to 3:2 DVD has been no problem. I have worked with scaling to make consistant widescreen effect. Now, I need to make a 16:9 DVD. Please help. This now needs to be on dvd at 16:9 going to Germany although pal was not specified in specs. the anamorphic footage is set at -33.33. Some of the dv footage was digitized as widescreen. When I export to compressor from 3:2 as a 16:9 mpeg in dvdsp the image still looks elongated. Please help. How do I work with anamorphic and 3:2 footage in one sequence and output as 16:9? I have removed the -33.33 and set it to zero, placed clips in anamorphic timeline and nothing seems to work. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site. </p>
<p>Working with  anamorphic footage and regular 3:2 footage in dv ntsc 3:2 sequence. Burnng this to 3:2 DVD has been no problem. I have worked with scaling to make consistant widescreen effect. Now, I need to make a 16:9 DVD. Please help. This now needs to be on dvd at 16:9 going to Germany although pal was not specified in specs. the anamorphic footage is set at -33.33. Some of the dv footage was digitized as widescreen. When I export to compressor from 3:2 as a 16:9 mpeg in dvdsp the image still looks elongated. Please help. How do I work with anamorphic and 3:2 footage in one sequence and output as 16:9? I have removed the -33.33 and set it to zero, placed clips in anamorphic timeline and nothing seems to work. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-221831</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-221831</guid>
		<description>You can also just crop 4:3 vid using the crop tool.   Crop to 13 off the top and 13 off the bottom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also just crop 4:3 vid using the crop tool.   Crop to 13 off the top and 13 off the bottom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-217097</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-217097</guid>
		<description>BradL-

Depending on your needs, I would probably recommend that you use anamorphic mode and do not use the lens adapter. You don't get a whole lot of improvement in the picture quality with the lens adapter, and it makes your production and post production workflow a big pain. Also, depending on the adapter, you are probably limiting the range within which you can zoom before seeing vignetting.

You are DEFINITELY not better off shooting 4:3 and letterboxing. Anamorphic is superior in all ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BradL-</p>
<p>Depending on your needs, I would probably recommend that you use anamorphic mode and do not use the lens adapter. You don&#8217;t get a whole lot of improvement in the picture quality with the lens adapter, and it makes your production and post production workflow a big pain. Also, depending on the adapter, you are probably limiting the range within which you can zoom before seeing vignetting.</p>
<p>You are DEFINITELY not better off shooting 4:3 and letterboxing. Anamorphic is superior in all ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradL</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-214542</link>
		<dc:creator>BradL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-214542</guid>
		<description>I'm about to shoot a short using a GL2.  I had planned on using a 16:9 Lens Adaptor plus using Instant HD upscaling software w/FCP 6.   The final product would DVCAM DVD or HD DVD.  However, would I be better off just shooting 4:3 but framing it for letterbox or what?

Now reading all this information, I'm not sure.

My plans was to enter the short in the film festival curcuit.  So most of the time the DVD will be projected on a large screen.

Confused.

Thanx in Advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about to shoot a short using a GL2.  I had planned on using a 16:9 Lens Adaptor plus using Instant HD upscaling software w/FCP 6.   The final product would DVCAM DVD or HD DVD.  However, would I be better off just shooting 4:3 but framing it for letterbox or what?</p>
<p>Now reading all this information, I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>My plans was to enter the short in the film festival curcuit.  So most of the time the DVD will be projected on a large screen.</p>
<p>Confused.</p>
<p>Thanx in Advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaay</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-202871</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-202871</guid>
		<description>Text is appearing very blurry on my 16:9 Plasma. 18px (Ariel Reg) text almost unreadable. I am burning my DVD in DVD Studio pro
AE 7 setting are:
COMP SIZE: 1024X576 (SQUARE PX)
RENDERING SETTING: QUICKTIME (ANIMATION) FULL RESOLUTION
Importing in DVD studio and encoding there.

DVD STUDIO ENCODING SETTING:
ASPECT RATIO: 16:9
FIELD ORDER: AUTO
MODE: TWO PASS VBR
BIT RATE: 5.5
MAX BIT RATE: 7.2
MOTION ESTIMATION: BEST

Please let me know where I am making mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Text is appearing very blurry on my 16:9 Plasma. 18px (Ariel Reg) text almost unreadable. I am burning my DVD in DVD Studio pro<br />
AE 7 setting are:<br />
COMP SIZE: 1024X576 (SQUARE PX)<br />
RENDERING SETTING: QUICKTIME (ANIMATION) FULL RESOLUTION<br />
Importing in DVD studio and encoding there.</p>
<p>DVD STUDIO ENCODING SETTING:<br />
ASPECT RATIO: 16:9<br />
FIELD ORDER: AUTO<br />
MODE: TWO PASS VBR<br />
BIT RATE: 5.5<br />
MAX BIT RATE: 7.2<br />
MOTION ESTIMATION: BEST</p>
<p>Please let me know where I am making mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enanovi</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-170605</link>
		<dc:creator>Enanovi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-170605</guid>
		<description>Use final cut... widescreen filter is in the generators folder i believe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use final cut&#8230; widescreen filter is in the generators folder i believe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-115246</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-115246</guid>
		<description>Hey I was wondering if anyone knows how to get the black bars across the screen before i compress the footage so it looks 16/9 on a 4/3 monitor. Should i go into after effects and import the project from finalcut and make a black background at 720/576? then layer the project on top of the black background then cut the top and bottom off? is that the only way to do it? how do u do it? thr must be another way that wont require exporting and importing into other programs. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I was wondering if anyone knows how to get the black bars across the screen before i compress the footage so it looks 16/9 on a 4/3 monitor. Should i go into after effects and import the project from finalcut and make a black background at 720/576? then layer the project on top of the black background then cut the top and bottom off? is that the only way to do it? how do u do it? thr must be another way that wont require exporting and importing into other programs. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cht</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-79159</link>
		<dc:creator>cht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-79159</guid>
		<description>Keep up this great resource http://www.chtodelat.org/uploadfiles/f/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up this great resource <a href="http://www.chtodelat.org/uploadfiles/f/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chtodelat.org/uploadfiles/f/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/2005/06/05/new-article-delivering-a-169-project-using-43-footage/#comment-10624</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johnjosephbachir.org/?p=164#comment-10624</guid>
		<description>I would recommend always going with anamorphic (squashed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend always going with anamorphic (squashed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<a href="http://evterpa.co.uk/"><small>All of mp3</small></a>